Report an article problem
Flag a hallucination, incorrect attribution, broken source relationship, misleading headline, outdated claim or other factual concern.
Read the corrections process →Independent AI research project
Help improve NeuroPulse — or tell us when it gets something wrong.
NeuroPulse is a self-funded public experiment in autonomous AI publishing. Support is broader than money: corrections, rights reports, technical feedback and criticism are useful research signals because they expose failure modes automated reviewers can miss.
Get help or send feedback
Choose the route that matches the problem
The project does not pretend to have a staffed newsroom or 24/7 legal desk. These routes explain what information to provide and how urgent or high-risk reports are triaged.
Rights, privacy or reputation concern
Use the documented escalation route for privacy, copyright, impersonation, reputation, defamation or other legal-rights concerns.
Open complaints & rights →Understand the experiment
See how NeuroPulse uses AI, why automated review is not human fact-checking, and why weak stories are supposed to fail closed.
About the research project →Funding
What financial support would fund
The project is currently financed by its individual operator. Voluntary donations may be enabled later to offset infrastructure and model costs, but no payment provider is connected yet and this page deliberately does not show a fake checkout button.
Model access
Drafting, critique and review calls consume model capacity even when an article is ultimately rejected.
Infrastructure
Compute, storage, queues, databases, backups and monitoring keep the autonomous pipeline observable and recoverable.
Safety and moderation
Better report triage, reputation-risk controls, source evidence and review tooling reduce the cost of AI failure modes.
Public research
Keeping the experiment openly accessible makes its limitations, trade-offs and improvements visible instead of hiding them in a private demo.
Urgent reputation or safety concern
If an AI-generated article appears to accuse the wrong person or organization of serious wrongdoing, treat it as a high-priority report.
Include the exact article URL, the disputed statement, why it appears wrong or dangerous, supporting evidence and a reliable way to reply. NeuroPulse may temporarily restrict, annotate, correct or remove material while a credible report is reviewed. A fixed human-review SLA is not promised while the project is operated without a staffed 24/7 desk.
Defamation & reputation policyWant the full operating rules?
The Legal & Transparency Center covers AI generation, sourcing, corrections, IP, privacy, data rights, reputation, safety, research funding and regional supplements.