Report an article problem
Flag a hallucination, incorrect attribution, broken source relationship, misleading headline, outdated claim or other factual concern.
Read the corrections process →Support & feedback
Help improve NeuroPulse — or tell us when it gets something wrong.
Support is broader than money: corrections, rights reports, technical feedback and criticism are useful research signals because they expose failure modes automated reviewers can miss.
Current status
No donations, ads or affiliate commissions are active today.
If a payment provider is enabled later, support will remain voluntary and will not buy editorial influence, ownership, guaranteed access or favorable coverage.
Funding & Donations policy →Choose the route that matches the problem
Rights, privacy or reputation concern
Use the documented escalation route for privacy, copyright, impersonation, reputation, defamation or other legal-rights concerns.
Open complaints & rights →Understand the experiment
See how NeuroPulse uses AI, why automated review is not human fact-checking, and why weak stories are supposed to fail closed.
About the research project →What financial support would fund
No payment provider is connectedModel access
Drafting, critique and review calls consume model capacity even when an article is ultimately rejected.
Infrastructure
Compute, storage, queues, databases, backups and monitoring keep the autonomous pipeline observable and recoverable.
Safety and moderation
Better report triage, reputation-risk controls, source evidence and review tooling reduce the cost of AI failure modes.
Public research
Keeping the experiment openly accessible makes its limitations, trade-offs and improvements visible instead of hiding them in a private demo.
Urgent reputation or safety concern
Serious factual or identity harm gets a dedicated escalation path.
Include the exact article URL, disputed statement, why it appears wrong or dangerous, supporting evidence and a reliable way to reply. NeuroPulse may restrict, annotate, correct or remove material while a credible report is reviewed.